Benedict XVI is not part of One World, One Dream Beijing 2008 Olympics

Benedict XVI is not part of the One World One Dream Beijing Olympics 2008. His doctrines and papal books are totally inutile in the world of sports. Most of all, his poster boy crippled repugnant John Paul Ii won’t even qualify for the Paralympics.

The Catholic Italian basketball team lost to the atheist Russian team. This shows that all those Sacrament of Eucharist LIES are useless in the world of sports.

Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei are totally extraterrestrial outside of this world. Their world is the Octopus Dei WORLD DOMINATION of LIES with their Pinocchio-nose liar John Allen of ncr café as his paramount lay Opus Dei spin writer and deceiver of the Catholic world.

Benedict XVI is obsolete and irrelevant in the Beijing 2008 Olympics. He is a pathetic ugly old bestial liar of “salvation”. Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei only concoct LIES of salvation about Jesus Christ and therefore they had to silence the Jesuit Jon Sobrino who criticized John Paul II.

King Herod trembled at John the Baptist and thus beheaded him likewise Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei tremble at Jon Sobrino and therefore they silenced him for good.


I LOVE BEIJING Olympics 2008

Proof of Benedict XVI is GAY

This was recently sent to us as proof that Benedict XVI is GAY. We have already exposed his private secretary, Georg, as GAY according to the Italian GAYS in Rome.

The voice of Benedict XVI is very effiminate, his walk is also efffeminate. The Opus Dei journalist-liar Pinnochio nose John Allen of ncr calls him as "gentle" but really Benedict XVI is a pimpy drag filled with make-up old GAY man living with his live-in lover GAY Georg.

The Jesuit public secretary of Benedict XVI only takes his dog-ration each morning from Monsignor Georg....and he barks it out to the world whatever Benedict XVI want him to do. Poor Jesuit-elephant on Octopus Dei leasch.


---------

The Homosexual Colonization of The Catholic Church [www.riteofsodomy.com]



In Randy Engel's book The Rite of Sodomy: Homosexuality and the Roman Catholic Church (New Engel Publishing, 2006; 724-327-7379; www.riteofsod­omy.com), she lays out the invasion, colonization, and the metastasization of the priesthood and religious life by homosexuals in the Catholic Church.

On the first page of the Introduction, Engel notes that she wrote an article in The Wanderer (summer of 1987) in which the editor deleted her reference to "homosexual bishops." She says: "I remember promising myself" that as soon as "my familial and pro-life duties as the director of the U.S. Coalition for Life would permit, I would take a closer look at the members of the Catholic hierarchy…." She names the names of homosexual bishops with copious citations and notes. This book, a decade in the making, reveals the homosexual "maelstrom" in the Catholic Church.

The book was published in July 2006 and has 1,174 pages containing 4,523 endnotes, and a detailed Index. There is some irrelevant material, but not too much.

Mrs. Engel says her book is not for the faint of heart, which we will see later.

She says that "neither the Holy Father nor the Church hierarchy appear to have the necessary will, heart and stomach" to clean up the homosexuality in the Church's ranks.

In the 20th century, the Second Vatican Council "triggered" the homosexual colonization in the Church. A lot of this is due to the pontificate of Pope Paul VI. Engel says that Paul VI was a homosexual, and she gives evidence for this. Engel says that "Pope Paul VI played a decisive role in the selection and advancement of many homosexual members of the American hierarchy...." And it still continues.

Regarding the recent Vatican document on homosexuals in the seminary, Engel says: "In a Vatican Radio interview on November 29, 2005, Cardinal Grocholewski [Prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education, which is charged with implementing the document] stated this might include a person who engaged in homosexual acts out of adolescent curiosity; or while intoxicated; or where he prostituted his body to obtain favors. High standards, indeed, for the most sublime of all vocations! The cardinal went out of his way to state that the norms expressed in the document do not apply to already ordained homosexual priests,...acknowledging that Pope Benedict XVI, like his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, has no plans to clean house and mount a serious attack on the Homosexual Collective within the Roman Catholic priesthood and religious life."

Pope Benedict XVI recently appointed Donald Wuerl to the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C. Wuerl was a protégé of Bishop John Wright (initially the Auxiliary Bishop of Boston). According to Engel, "Wright's pederastic predilections were an 'open secret' in the Archdiocese of Boston." Bill Burnett accused Bishop Wright of pederasty. Here is an instance of where the book is not for the faint-hearted. If you don't like to read sexually graphic accounts, do not read what Engel has to say about the rite of sodomy here (for it will make you sick):
Burnett stated that the abuse ritual began with drinks, a Coke for him and Coke and alcohol for [Fr. Raymond] Page [his uncle] and [Bishop] Wright. Wright would then undress him, fall on his knees before the standing boy and cover him with kisses -- feet, penis, nipples and lips. He and Page would then undress and while the latter stimulated Wright from behind (without penetration), Bill would fellate the bishop.

When Wright neared ejaculation he would turn Bill around and sodomize him. Then Page took his turn at raping his nephew.... [We will spare you the rest of the gruesome story.] When it was all over, Wright handed Bill a $20 bill like he always did.

Then Bishop Wright was made Bishop of Pittsburgh, and this is where Wuerl became his private secretary, protégé, and remained at Wright's side (as he was made a cardinal) until Wright's death in 1979. Is this guilt by association? Who knows?

Engel writes: "From 1980 to 1985, Fr. Wuerl served as Vice Rector and Rector of St. Paul Seminary. The seminary had a reputation for rampant homosexuality going back to the days of Bishop Wright." Then Wuerl became Bishop of Pittsburgh in February 1988, fulfilling his protégé role.

Writes Engel: "After Donald Wuerl was posted to the Diocese of Pittsburgh, he permitted Dignity/Pittsburgh Masses to continue for eight more years.... Dignity/Pittsburgh was one of the last chapters to be evicted from Catholic facilities in the United States [on orders from the Vatican]. According to Pittsburgh Post-Gazette staff writer Ann Rodgers-Melnick, 'Banning Dignity was a sad moment for Wuerl.'... Under Wuerl, the Pittsburgh Diocese has become a stomping ground for nationally-known doctrinal and moral miscreants including Father (now ex-priest) Matthew Fox, Sister Fran Ferder, Father Robert Nugent, Sister Jeannine Gramick, Father Raymond Brown and howling feminists Rosemary Radford Ruether and Monica Hellwig."

In the summer of 1996, Mother's Watch featured a lengthy article called "Bishop Wuerl's Magnificent Obsession." Engel mentions a segment "dealing with Wuerl's exceptional relations with the members of the Pittsburgh 'gay' community who refer to the bishop as 'Donna' Wuerl...." We've heard that too.

Engel also has doubts about Pope Benedict's manliness. Engel says: "Rome correspondents report that the new pope has acquired expensive taste in designer shoes and accessories, a reputation for 'slightly eccentric behavior' and 'a penchant for disguise.' During Christmas 2005, the pope was photographed showing off a red medieval fur-lined hat -- a picture that can only be described as overtly camp. One month later, La Stampa reported that the pope has been secretly visiting his old residence at 1 Piazza Citta Leonina disguised in black clerical robes in the company of another accessory -- his very handsome 48-year-old private secretary and traveling companion, Don Georg Gänswein." We know just the mention of this will upset some of our readers; however, there is no need to jump to conclusions about this. Let's hope he's straight as an arrow.

But there is a disturbing pattern: Benedict appointed "gay"-friendly Archbishop William Levada to be the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; Benedict appointed "gay"-friendly Donald Wuerl to be Archbishop of Washington, D.C.; and Benedict appointed "gay"-friendly George Niederauer to be Archbishop of San Francisco. And Benedict signed the document on homosexuals in the seminary, a toothless document that can be interpreted any way you want.

Don't expect any reforms in the homosexual colonization of the Catholic Church, or what Engel calls the "Homosexual Collective." Sweetie-pie seminarians and priests will continue to flock into the priesthood, and some of them will advance up into the hierarchy. Business as usual.


www.newoxfordreview.org
November 2006

Benedict XVI is the ugliest leader, Vladimir Putin is nicer to look at

Opus Dei Benedict XVI is the ugliest leader

The atheist Vladimir Putin is nicer to look at...at least he never led a Pedophile Priests Army for 26 years!

Look at the ugliest face of a leader of a state and Benedict XVI is the ugliest of them all. Vladimir Putin, leader of an atheist country looks a lot more handsome – and pleasant -- than Benedict XVI. If God's creation reflects his beauty, then Benedict XVI reflects the ugliness of Satan -- just like John Paul II reflected Satan in his last years on earth.

There is nothing godly in Benedict XVI’s countenance, his grin is worse than a racoon’s. His eyes are worse than a raging wolf.

Benedict XVI walk and talk in the most effeminate manner.


John Paul II was talking worse than a dog with saliva drooling from his ugly mouth and no words of his was audible. God wanted the world to see what John Paul II had become as self-narcissist leader worshipping himself and St. Josemaria Escriva, the god of the Opus Dei.


Today God want us to see also the ugliness of Benedict XVI, covered with tons of foundation and make-up by his GAY daily movie producer Zeffirelli. Beneidct XVI too will have the same fate of John Paul Ii who took his own life rather than be a comatose pope. In reality, Benedict XVI is a living comatose pope – powerless, irrelevant and useless to anyone’s salvation.


Benedict XVI the Rich and the Octopus Dei beast silenced the Jesuit Jon Sobrino the Poor because they couldn’t stand the message of the John the Baptist of the 21st century Jon Sobrino. Opus Dei does not allow any criticism of the pope or papacy and so they silence and destroy their critics in many subtle ways.


I see Satan in Benedict XVI

His eyes are the windows of his soul-of-LIES
His sinful soul that covered-up priest-pedophilia
For over a quarter of a century


I see Satan in Benedict XVI’s LIES
For he is the 21st century “Father of Lies”
Just like John Paul II the “Holy Father of Lies” of the 20th century
And the Opus Dei the “Fathers of Lies”


I see Satan in Benedict XVI
His papal ugly face reflects the state of Hell
His faulty “Conscience of our Age”
Silenced the Jesuit Jon Sobrino of the Poor of Yahweh


I see Satan in Benedict XVI
The wealth abhorred by Satan on earth is in the Vatican
Benedict XVI the Rich and Jon Sobrino the Poor
Benedict XVI shall burn in Hell and Jon Sobrino like Lazarus shall rise in Heaven.



----

I see His Blood upon the Rose
By Joseph Mary Plunkett (1887–1916)

I SEE his blood upon the rose
And in the stars the glory of his eyes,
His body gleams amid eternal snows,
His tears fall from the skies.


I see his face in every flower;
The thunder and the singing of the birds
Are but his voice—and carven by his power
Rocks are his written words.


All pathways by his feet are worn,
His strong heart stirs the ever-beating sea,
His crown of thorns is twined with every thorn,
His cross is every tree.

Benedict XVI camouflage ugliness with fur

Benedict XVI camouflage ugliness with fur

The true ugliness that God sees in Benedict XVI manifest itself in the ugly grin of the Pope and his wolverine eyes worse than a raccoon or a snake’s stare.

So GAY Pope Benedict XVI hired GAY Zeffirelli to direct his papal appearance everyday and provide his make-up to cover up his ugliness with tons of make-up and foundation.

After pasting his face, he covers himself up with fur and colors – so that the 1.2 Catholics will adore his papal costumes and believe he is the Vicar of Christ.

A little girl in New York said after seeing the Pope “I felt like I just saw Christ on earth”. Bet ya she was an Opus Dei daughter and if she really saw the pope close range she’d rather run and cuddle Mickey Mouse another fictitious character like the Pope. But Mickey Mouse is more edifying than the LIAR Opus Dei Pope Benedict XVI.

----------

Cat-loving pope urged to stop wearing ermine

Animal-rights activists want pontiff to remove stoat fur from hats, robes

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26176751/

updated 10:46 a.m. ET, Wed., Aug. 13, 2008

The Italian Association for Defense of Animals and the Environment, which has a white bunny logo, has started an online petition signed by nearly 1,900 people asking Pope Benedict to stop wearing ermine on his hats and robes.

Ermine is the white winter fur of the stoat, which has been used to trim the crowns, ceremonial hats and robes of European royalty, aristocrats, judges and popes for centuries.

The pope wore the fur-trimmed hat and cape before pilgrims around Christmas in 2005, giving him the look of Santa Claus and delighting well-wishers and photographers alike.

Corriere della Sera newspaper had photos Benedict and one of his predecessors, Pope John XIII, wearing an ermine-trimmed hat and cape. It put the shots next to a picture of a live stoat.

But the petition appealed not to the pope's fashion sense, but to his reputation as an animal lover, which has even prompted an authorized biography of the pope narrated by a cat.
Published last year, “Chico and Joseph” is based on a real cat called Chico who took up with the pope in his native Germany when he was plain Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.

The cat belongs to the caretakers of the house where Ratzinger lived before moving to Rome in 1981. As a cardinal in Rome, the future pope befriended another cat he found on the street and kept it in his apartment until being elected pope.

Petitioners gave their reasons for signing on the Web site.

“The pope has a cat he loves a lot, so why doesn't he use it for one of his capes?” wrote one of the petitioners, who signed as Sergio Porcelli from Ercolano, near Naples.

The pope's fashion sense has come under light-hearted media scrutiny, with Esquire magazine naming 81-year-old Benedict “accessorizer of the year” in 2007 for red leather loafers it said were made by Prada — which the Vatican newspaper denied.

View the petition here.

Benedict XVI non-existent in Olympics in Beijing 2008

Opus Dei Benedict XVI is non-existent in the Olympics in Beijing 2008 and in ALL Olympics.

Opus Dei Benedict XVI is not part of "One World, One Dream" of the Beijing 2008 Olympics. Benedict XVI is only part of the Opus Dei WORLD DOMINATION Agenda and the secret underworld of the Octopus Dei-beast surrounded by journalist-liars lead by John Allen of the ncr cafe who prop-up and camouflage his ugliness.

Vladimir Putin is more handsome than Benedict XVI. The true ugly interior of Benedict XVI shows in his outer countenance.

As head of the Vatican State, Benedict XVI had no delegate to the Olympics because none of his members would qualify in any sports. Benedict XVI himself can hardly walk from the Vatican to the Gesu Church where the 225 Jesuits from all over the world gathered for their opening and closing Mass of their 35th General Congregation last January to March, 2008. If Benedict XVI cannot walk that short distance from the Vatican to the Gesu, he cannot walk to anywhere.

And the Cardinals and Bishops members at the Vatican are nothing but lame ducks and porky lazy eunuchs and GAYS.

So GAY Pope Benedict XVI and his Opus Dei are not sports nor sportive. The only thing they are good at is LYING until their death, sitting down in their palatial abode at the Vatican, all they do is concoct LIES after LIES to deceive the world and the 1.2 Catholics.

They keep lying about the Sacrament of the Eucharist as the “Source and Summit of the Christian Life” and the Vatican is the center of the Catholic Faith – but Benedict XVI was no show at the Mass of the new Father General Alfonso Nicolas at the Gesu Church.

The Jesuit were at their international Olympics in their 35th General Congregation and Benedict XVI their “Holy Father” was no-show. Benedict XVI's total absence in all Jesuit Mass shows what a LIAR Benedict XVI is and the Opus Dei eunuchs who surround him and control his agenda.

Benedict XVI and Opus Dei use the Mass to control Catholics and instil guilt in them if they missed it by saying it is a “mortal sin” if they missed Mass on “holy days of obligation”.

Where are the mortal sins of those more than 5,485 lusty John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army?

Rich Benedict XVI cannot enter the "Eye of the Needle"

Benedict XVI the Rich Pope versus Jon Sobrino the Poor Jesuit

Christ said in his The Rich Young Man Parable: "And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God". Matthew 19:24

Benedict is the Rich Old man who cannot enter the kingdom of God.

Benedict continue to mislead the Catholics via his Opus Dei written books that seek only one goal: Opus Dei World Domination and the worship of St. Josemaria and John Paul II.

Benedict XVI continue to proclaim lies of Satan from his papal fanatical-infallible-Chair of Peter and his Dominus Jesu narcissist-lie that "there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church" .

Well, Jesuit Jon Sobrino beg to differ from the fake-Christ Benedict XVI through this most recent book that "there is no salvation outside the the poor".

It is self-evident who is right: Poor Jon Sobrino who is a bonafide "Companion of Jesus" and not evil-rich-GAY-pope Benedict XVI.


The Eye of the Needle
No Salvation Outside the Poor:
A Utopian-Prophetic Essay

2 July 2008

Jon Sobrino SJ
Darton, Longman and Todd, 2008
96 pages
ISBN: 978-0232527391

At a recent Theos event in the House of Commons to mark a visit of the American Christian writer and campaigner from Soujourners, Jim Wallis, all the spokespersons for the main political parties agreed that doing something to eradicate poverty in Britain was a good thing; the ‘poor’ were not to be left to their plight, or simply blamed for being there. But what was worrying was a disturbing tone of condescension, not least in the suggestion from a politician that of course it was the job of the Church – and churchgoers – to show Christian charity and help the poor, especially through a bit of extra voluntary work in one’s spare time or a more generous donation of one’s surplus resources.

Of course, this is at least encouraging after decades of outright rejection even of the existence of poor people in Britain, decades of debate over how poverty is to be defined – and if it’s only ‘relative poverty’ (measured in exact relation to the better off and the rich) then it can be assumed to be part of a ‘culture of envy’ and idealistic, unattainable and economically damaging ‘equality’. Accepting that some poor people might exist does not automatically carry us into a clear and detailed analysis of complex causes to be tackled – but it does fit neatly into a rather more compassionate version of the economic growth and trickle-down theory which universally dominates global economic, social policy and ethics. Rather than ‘step over the poor on the way to the opera’, as one Conservative minister once put it, at least there is now an acknowledgement that they should be helped rather than ignored… wealth creation and economic growth should, in principle, reach down to clear up the place … But El Salvadoran Jesuit, Jon Sobrino, calls a halt, describing as ‘unethical’ the approach that says ‘any means of alleviating poverty will do’.

Jon Sobrino’s brief ‘utopian-prophetic essay’ The Eye of the Needle is a deep challenge to this whole approach. Basically, those who talk and write about the poor are usually in the wrong place, even pushing to help them from the wrong position. Those who are not poor need to start from somewhere else – among the poor – or at least listening to the poor; they need to relocate, and radically move to a different viewpoint.

The core of his case is in the book’s subtitle, No Salvation Outside the Poor, or as spells it out, ‘no salvation outside or apart from the poor’; ‘we start by linking salvation to the poor and by seeing the poor as the setting where salvation is possible’ (p.41). He goes on to cite Dom Pedro Casaldaliga, ‘without – apart from – the poor there is no salvation, without – apart from – the poor, there is no Church, without – apart from – the poor, there is no Gospel’.

It’s a strong radical position – ‘no Church’ apart from the poor? What does this mean? Jon Sobrino knows that letting salvation come from the poor is not easy to accept and it requires a new logic. The difficulty is that even the concept ‘the preferential option for the poor’, introduced at the Latin American Bishops Conference of Medellin in 1968 is not only interpreted differently in different contexts, it has been modified and mollified under the guise of reaffirmation as it has passed on through recent encyclicals. Puebla in 1979 affirmed the ‘need for conversion on the part of the whole Church to a preferential option for the poor – an option aimed at their integral liberation’. By Sollicitudo Rei Socialis the preferential option for the poor had become ‘a special form of primacy in the exercise of Christian charity’ – not too far from ‘be kind and nice to the poor’, and certainly nervous of a concept that may undermine cosy consensus politics and provoke conflict (pitting one group or class against another).

Sobrino insists on focusing on this ‘need for conversion’ and draws the concept of the preferential option for the poor back to its Christological roots, in the Gospel accounts of Jesus Christ unjustly put to death on a cross, thereby identifying himself (and God) with all victims. ‘The question therefore is not whether someone is seeking God or not, but whether they are among the poor and victims’.

As Sobrino spells out in his brief analysis of the globalised economy, absolutising the right to property and dispensing with ethics means that ‘the rich and most powerful countries have abdicated from democratic principles (justice, freedom, equality, solidarity) in favour of the laws of the market’, and as a result, every day 25,000 die of hunger, while worldwide spending on the most profitable arms trade escalates to a staggering £3.3bn a day (p.23). ‘Directly or indirectly hunger, weapons, forced migrations through lack of land, water or soil result in death’; all this turns the vast majority of our world into crucified people, whose human face continues to be wiped out by the sin of the world.

The Eye of the Needle is no naïve call for political change or ‘alternative worlds’, nor is it a classic romanticisation of the poor. Drawing on the work of his martyred Jesuit brother Ignacio Ellacuria, together they look to ‘the poor with spirit’ (notably not ‘in’ spirit) who die before their time as the key to salvation. Says Sobrino, ‘put simply, the poor have values and produce positive results, which though they may not represent massive changes to social forms do point the way and do offer elements of a new society’.

Even in the British context, to believe that of the people of Dewsbury who gathered round when little Shannon Matthews disappeared would be a break with a culture permanently blaming and mocking the poor. But Sobrino’s deep message is that championing the Millennium Development Goals or being kind to the poor is not radical enough. The call to conversion and ‘redemption’ (a term Sobrino notes is today ignored, p.68) means that we cannot miss out the experience of the Crucifixion and ‘paying the price’. He concludes, ‘the times do not seem to be right for talking like that. Our society’s – understandable but dangerous – goal is to save only by producing goods, as if then its evils would disappear of their own accord without leaving any scars and without sin’s habit of ‘creeping back’ to produce death and inhumanity again’. The prophet in Sobrino leaves us on the hook with the parable of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke’s Gospel: ‘they will not change even if someone rises from the dead’!

John Battle, Member of Parliament for Leeds West.
http://www.thinkingfaith.org/articles/BOOK_20080702_1.htm

Benedict XVI the Rich Man and Jesuit Jon Sobrino the Lazarus

Opus Dei GAY Pope Benedict XVI is the Rich Man and Jesuit Jon Sobrino is the Lazarus in Christ's Parable.

Christ did not write books nor did he have theological credentials like his narcissist-Vicar of Christ. He spoke in Parables that everyone can understand.

As Benedict XVI live in the lap of luxury at the Vatican-owned and operated by Opus Dei, he silenced Jon Sobrino the humble Jesuit missionary who work among the poorest of Christ's brethren in El Salvador.

The real reason Benedict XVI silenced the Jesuit Jon Sobrino is because Sobrino criticized Pope John Paul II and his papal hypocrisy as opposed to the Opus Dei who want to make John Paul II the semi-god next to St. Josemaria Escriva the god of Opus Dei.

So to speed the canonization of John Paul II, Benedict XVI appointed a Jesuit from the Gregorian University to head the Office for the Canonization of Saints-- to make it look like the "Jesuits versus the Jesuits".

Poor Jesuits, they are mighty elephants tied to the Octopus Dei beast leasch as they were muffled in their 35th General Congregation which we chronicled here in our weblog.

Who is more pleasing to Christ, Benedict XVI or Jon Sobrino?

Benedict XVI NEVER dirtied his hands to feed the poor like Jon Sobrino. Benedict XVI lives in the most lavish Vatican Palace that rivals the Buckingham Palace.

If Christ were to walk in the streets of the Vatican or in El Salvador, who would he feel more at home with, the pompous conceited egomanic Benedict XVI or his poor "Companion of Jesus" Jesuit Jon Sobrino?

The answer is plain and clear in the Parable of Christ about the Rich Man and Lazarus. Jon Sobrino has been silenced by the Opus Dei Bishop of El Salvador and served "Notification" by Benedict XVI and therefore Sobrino is eating crumbs within the Catholic Church as he is forbidden to speak and teach in Catholic universities and Catholic venues.

Look at the parallel of High Priest Benedict XVI and the Rich Man. From this parable, Benedict XVI is assured a place in the fires of Hell where he will join John Paul II and St. Josemaria Escriva who were both Rich Men in their lifetime!

The Rich Man

The high priest when Jesus spoke this parable was Caiaphas. We know from the Jewish historian Josephus, who wrote a detailed account of the period in Antiquities of the Jews, that Caiaphas met all 4 of the first qualifications of the Rich Man of Luke 16:
1. he was rich (v.19)
2. dressed in purple and fine linen (v.19)
3. lived in luxury every day (v.19)
4. in his lifetime he received good things (v.25)
(see Antiquities, XIII: 10:vi:p.281, XVIII:1:iv:p.377, also Wars of the Jews 11:8:xiv: p. 478)

Reading through the story we can find the following clues to the identity of the Rich Man: (our comments are preceded by ---)

he was rich (vs.19) --- Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei's Vatican is worth mroe than 1.6 trillion Euros
dressed in purple and fine linen (vs.19) --- Benedict XVI is dressed in red Prada shoes and fine papal white linen and red cape
lived in luxury every day (vs.19) --- Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei live in luxury everyday
in his lifetime he received good things (vs.25) --- Benedict Xvi and the Opsu Dei receive good things only
he had five brothers (vs.28) --- Benedict XVI has Opus Dei brothers and Bishops and CArdinals clones of John Paul II and St. Josemaria
they lived in his father’s house (vs.27) --- Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei live at the Vatican Palace
they had Moses and the Prophets (vs.25) --- Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei believe only in their own narcissit-doctrines and dogmas and papal books and BULLS
but they did not listen to them (vs.29) --- therefore Benedict XVI and Opus Dei did not listen to prophet Tom Doyle and Jon Sobrino
they would not be convinced even if someone were to rise from the dead (vs.31) --- they would not be convinced by The John Paul II Millstone and SNAP website

It is not obvious to the modern reader who this Rich Man is. But it should be clear that the picture is much too detailed to simply be ‘a representative of all rich men’.

But the Pharisees listening would have known immediately whom Christ was referring to. There was not any chance of their mistaking it, because only one man in Israel dressed in purple and fine linen. A man who fitted exactly all the clues which Jesus gave as to the identity of the Rich Man.

(Excertps taken from http://www.christadelphia.org/pamphlet/p_lazarus.htm. This article explains Christ's parable better than Benedict XVI did in his recent book.)


Likewise Benedict XVI is the "only one man in the world dressed in white and red papal cape"

Benedict XVI like the Rich man did not listen to the prophet Tom Doyle and therefore covered-up the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army for more than 26 years.

Here is the Parable of The Rich Man, Lazarus and Abraham. Benedict XVI fits the Rich Man like a pair of gloves! Opus Dei and Benedict XVI are the rich Pharisees of the 21st Century that Christ would vomit out of his Mystical Body!

Luke 16:19-31

There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day.

At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores,
and longing to eat what fell from the Rich Man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The Rich Man also died and was buried.

In Hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side.

So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire’.
But Abraham replied, ‘Son remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony.

And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone else cross over from there to us.’

He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father’s house,
for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.

Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’
‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead’ (NIV)

More analysis of the Parable here http://www.christadelphia.org/pamphlet/p_lazarus.htm. The similarities of Benedict XVI with the Rich Man are self-evident and self-explanatory


We follow-up on the autocracy of Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei Archbishop of El Salvador and their Galileo-style persecution on Jon Sobrino
---- http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2007_05_01_archive.html

Opus Dei GAY Pope Benedict XVI not part of the Olympics

Gay Pope Benedict XVI is not part of the Olympics because the Olympics is "regardless of ethnic origin, religion... What can Benedict XVI and those porky fat Cardinals and Bishops do at the Olympics anyway, run and jump with their Opus Dei wealth at the Vatican Bank? All they can do is carry the MILLSTONE rap around their pedophilia-necks for covering-up the John Paul II Pedophile Priests Army.

With his red papal shoes Benedict XVI could not even walk to the Gesu church to say ONE single Mass with the 225 Jesuits. Benedict XVI is a fat ugly Octopus Dei papal beast. Benedict XVI is physically incapable of any sports.

The only sports that Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei priests who surround him do is LYING with their tongue, they are "Fathers of Lies" like Satan par excellence.

Opus Dei Pope Benedict XVI cannot multiply loaves of bread or the flesh of Christ

The gospel of this Sunday is Christ multiplying loaves of bread but GAY Pope Benedict XVI cannot even multiply one loaf of bread therefore he cannot transform the Host into the flesh of Christ.

Opus Dei Pope Benedict XVI has no powers, so he tries to copycat the powers of Satan and write books of lies and speak words of lies and he silence the good truthful Jesuit Jon Sobrino who speaks the truth about the papacy.

Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei are "Fathers of Lies" and Satan and St. Josemaria Escriva and John Paul II are their GAY Mystical parents "Fathers of Lies".



Did Christ speak Latin?

So how can the Vicar of Christ make Latin the "official language" of the Mystical Body of Christ?

When did Christ ever wear red expensive shoes, don on ornate ceremonial albs, be surrounded and protected by a private army, be a political head of state, write Ph.D books no one can understand except himself and by a few men, oppress those who work with and for the poor like Jon Sobrino? If Christ were to visit Rome today, what would he say about the worse sins of pedophile priests seething beneath the Vatican archives (Crimen Sollicitationis) which are worse than the sins at the Temple of Solomon?

Would he recognize the Peter-the-Rock clones residing at the grand palace of the Vatican rivaling the palace of the Ceasars of Rome? Christ would gag at his ostentious "Vicar of Christ" when they meet for the first time, they'd be like the Prince and the Pauper, the Pope being (and dressed as) the Prince!

Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever and he would do like what he did when he got very angry with the marketeers at the Temple and turned the tables upside down because they have "made God's temple a den of thieves" . But this time the Temple of the Vatican has become the Opus Dei (Ambrosiano Bank)den ... worst of all now the Vatican has become a "den of High Priests-pedophiles"! So Christ would repeat the curse of the Temple of Solomon that "not one stone will be left standing" about the Temple of the Vatican now owned and operated by the Octopus Dei.

We follow-up on the autocracy of Benedict XVI and the Opus Dei Archbishop of El Salvador and their Galileo-style persecution on Jon Sobrino
---- http://pope-ratz.blogspot.com/2007_05_01_archive.html

Opus Dei Pope Benedict XVI "obstructed" sex abuse inquiry: WYD World Youth Day apologies are to avoid prosecution by UN United Nations and secular law

Pope Benedict XVI is the Holy Father of Lies who says a few words of apology to victims while on record he "obstructed" justice and should be put to jail together with his cohorts in crime Cardinal Bernard Law, Cardinal Mahony, see list in http://jp2army.blogspot.com/.


The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/apr/24/children.childprotection

Pope 'obstructed' sex abuse inquiry
Confidential letter reveals Ratzinger ordered bishops to keep allegations secret

Jamie Doward, religious affairs correspondent The Observer, Sunday April 24 2005

Article historyPope Benedict XVI faced claims last night he had 'obstructed justice' after it emerged he issued an order ensuring the church's investigations into child sex abuse claims be carried out in secret.
The order was made in a confidential letter, obtained by The Observer, which was sent to every Catholic bishop in May 2001.

It asserted the church's right to hold its inquiries behind closed doors and keep the evidence confidential for up to 10 years after the victims reached adulthood. The letter was signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who was elected as John Paul II's successor last week.

Lawyers acting for abuse victims claim it was designed to prevent the allegations from becoming public knowledge or being investigated by the police. They accuse Ratzinger of committing a 'clear obstruction of justice'.

The letter, 'concerning very grave sins', was sent from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican office that once presided over the Inquisition and was overseen by Ratzinger.

It spells out to bishops the church's position on a number of matters ranging from celebrating the eucharist with a non-Catholic to sexual abuse by a cleric 'with a minor below the age of 18 years'. Ratzinger's letter states that the church can claim jurisdiction in cases where abuse has been 'perpetrated with a minor by a cleric'.

The letter states that the church's jurisdiction 'begins to run from the day when the minor has completed the 18th year of age' and lasts for 10 years.

It orders that 'preliminary investigations' into any claims of abuse should be sent to Ratzinger's office, which has the option of referring them back to private tribunals in which the 'functions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative can validly be performed for these cases only by priests'.

'Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret,' Ratzinger's letter concludes. Breaching the pontifical secret at any time while the 10-year jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including the threat of excommunication.

The letter is referred to in documents relating to a lawsuit filed earlier this year against a church in Texas and Ratzinger on behalf of two alleged abuse victims. By sending the letter, lawyers acting for the alleged victims claim the cardinal conspired to obstruct justice.

Daniel Shea, the lawyer for the two alleged victims who discovered the letter, said: 'It speaks for itself. You have to ask: why do you not start the clock ticking until the kid turns 18? It's an obstruction of justice.'

Father John Beal, professor of canon law at the Catholic University of America, gave an oral deposition under oath on 8 April last year in which he admitted to Shea that the letter extended the church's jurisdiction and control over sexual assault crimes.

The Ratzinger letter was co-signed by Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone who gave an interview two years ago in which he hinted at the church's opposition to allowing outside agencies to investigate abuse claims.

'In my opinion, the demand that a bishop be obligated to contact the police in order to denounce a priest who has admitted the offence of paedophilia is unfounded,' Bertone said.

Shea criticised the order that abuse allegations should be investigated only in secret tribunals. 'They are imposing procedures and secrecy on these cases. If law enforcement agencies find out about the case, they can deal with it. But you can't investigate a case if you never find out about it. If you can manage to keep it secret for 18 years plus 10 the priest will get away with it,' Shea added.

A spokeswoman in the Vatican press office declined to comment when told about the contents of the letter. 'This is not a public document, so we would not talk about it,' she said.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2008/jul/17/australia.catholicism -- The Pope in SydneyThe Pope meets the Australian PM and takes a boat ride in Sydney harbour during a visit for World Youth Day